This isnât Congressional oversight but related.
D.A. Is Investigating Trump and His Company Over Fraud, Filing Suggests
The Manhattan district attorneyâs office suggested on Monday that it has been investigating President Trump and his company for possible bank and insurance fraud, a significantly broader inquiry than the prosecutors have acknowledged in the past.
The office of the district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., made the disclosure in a new federal court filing arguing Mr. Trump should have to comply with its subpoena seeking eight years of his personal and corporate tax returns. Mr. Trump has asked a judge to declare the subpoena invalid.
The prosecutors did not directly identify the focus of their inquiry but said that âundisputedâ news reports last year about Mr. Trumpâs business practices make it clear that the office had a legal basis for the subpoena.
The reports, including investigations into the presidentâs wealth and an article on the congressional testimony of his former lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, said that the president may have illegally inflated his net worth and the value of his properties to lenders and insurers. Lawyers for Mr. Trump have said he did nothing wrong.
A Manhattan prosecutor trying to get President Donald Trumpâs tax returns told a judge Monday that he was justified in demanding them, citing public reports of âextensive and protracted criminal conduct at the Trump Organization.â
Trumpâs lawyers last month said the grand jury subpoena for the tax returns was issued in bad faith and amounted to harassment of the president.
Manhattan District Attorney District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. is seeking eight years of the Republican presidentâs personal and corporate tax records, but has disclosed little about what prompted him to request the records, other than part of the investigation is related to payoffs made to women to keep them quiet about alleged affairs with Trump.
In a court filing Monday, though, attorneys for Vance said Trumpâs arguments that the subpoena was too broad stemmed from âthe false premiseâ that the probe was limited to so-called âhush-moneyâ payments.
âThis Court is already aware that this assertion is fatally undermined by undisputed information in the public record,â Vanceâs lawyers wrote.
They said public reporting demonstrates that at the time the subpoena was issues âthere were public allegations of possible criminal activity at Plaintiffâs New York County-based Trump Organization dating back over a decade.â
âThese reports describe transactions involving individual and corporate actors based in New York County, but whose conduct at times extended beyond New Yorkâs borders. This possible criminal activity occurred within the applicable statutes of limitations, particularly if the transactions involved a continuing pattern of conduct,â the lawyers said.
The lawyers urged Judge Victor Marrero to swiftly reject Trumpâs arguments, saying the baseless claims were threatening the investigation. Marrero, who ruled against Trump last year, has scheduled arguments to be fully submitted by mid-August.
âEvery day that goes by is another day Plaintiff effectively achieves the âtemporary absolute immunityâ that was rejected by this Court, the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court,â Vanceâs lawyers said. âEvery such day also increases the prospect of a loss of evidence or the expiration of limitations periods â the precise concerns that the Supreme Court observed justified its rejection of Plaintiffâs immunity claim in the first place.â
The Supreme Court last month rejected claims by Trumpâs lawyers that the president could not be criminally investigated while he was in office.
New FBI Documents From Muellerâs Russia Investigation Reveal What Witnesses Said About Trump
BuzzFeed News filed a public records lawsuit to get the documents Robert Mueller used to write his report. Today, we are publishing the ninth installment of what witnesses in the investigation told Muellerâs team.
CNN
Cross-posting I read a tweet about it but didnât follow up yesterday and then forgot this happened.
Watch: Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation: Day 2
WITNESSES
- The Honorable Sally Q. Yates
Former Deputy Attorney General Of The United States
Atlanta , GA
Sen Johnson (R-Wis)and Sen Grassley (R- Iowa) push back on the Democratic quotient of the Gang of Eight saying these two are not pushing to distribute disinformation regarding Biden and son Hunter. At stake here is the intelligence known to the Gang of Eight the multiple attempts of Russia, China etc to interfere with the 2020 election.
Two top Republican senators denied on Wednesday that they are pushing Russian disinformation, responding directly to charges from Democratic congressional leaders who have demanded additional public disclosures about the Kremlinâs interference in the 2020 presidential election.
Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who are spearheading investigations targeting presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his son Hunter, maintained that they have âneither sought out, relied upon, nor publicly released anything that could even remotely be considered disinformation.â
âIt is certainly our goal to eradicate foreign influence from our elections,â Johnson and Grassley wrote in a letter responding to the Democrats. âBut your use of this issue to knowingly and recklessly promote false narratives for political purposes is completely contrary to that goal.â
Their letter was addressed to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-Va.), and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
The four lawmakers make up the Democratic half of the Gang of Eight, the group of congressional and intelligence committee leaders who are privy to top-secret intelligence. Representatives for the Democrats did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Last month, the group demanded a briefing for all members of Congress focused on foreign interference in the 2020 election, based on their assertions that lawmakers are being targeted by those meddling efforts. They have also urged the Trump administration to publicly reveal additional information about the nature of the foreign-influence campaign. Intelligence officials told House lawmakers last week that the Russians are seeking to boost President Donald Trump in the 2020 campaign.
The public version of the letter was vague about those threats, but POLITICO reported that the classified addendum to the letter specifically names Johnsonâs investigation as vehicle for âlaunderingâ a foreign influence campaign aimed at denigrating Biden.
POLITICO also reported that the addendum states that a Ukrainian lawmaker, Andrii Derkach, sent information about Biden to Johnson, Grassley and other Trump allies who have pushed similar corruption claims against the Bidens. The senators have denied receiving such informational packets from Derkach, a Ukrainian lawmaker linked to the Kremlin who has long attempted to tar Biden.
Johnson and Grassley confirmed in the letter that the addendum does, in fact, mention the Biden investigation and the Derkach packets. They also said they did not receive access to the classified addendum until âlate last week.â
Comments
From Marcy Wheeler - Emptywheel.net - Analyzes back and forth between Judiciary committee membersâŠeach of the Râs berating ex Deputy AG Sally Yates, to get in their points about 7 incorrect Fisa applications, Bruce Orr, Christopher Steele and how Gen Flynn was only pushing Tâs agenda when talking to Kislyak.
Adding this
ADDING
Last Senate Intelligence report has been adopted as the final reportâŠafter it has been declassified. Wonder what it will look likeâŠit was the report which Former Intel Co-head Sen Burr
signed off on.
Seldin Reporter for VOA
he Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday voted to adopt its fifth and final report on Russiaâe election interference efforts in 2016, with committee leaders vowing to keep working towards releasing a declassified version of the report to the public.
The fifth report, the product of a years-long bipartisan investigation by the committee, covers counterintelligence findings, and was recently returned to the committee following a declassification review by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Appeals court rules against Trump, says House can sue to enforce McGahn subpoena
A federal appeals court on Friday upheld the Houseâs subpoena of former White House counsel Don McGahn, ruling that Congress has the right to enforce its subpoenas in court.
The 7-2 decision from the full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses an earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that declared that congressional subpoenas were essentially unenforceable.
"The Constitution charges Congress with certain responsibilities, including to legislate, to conduct oversight of the federal government, and, when necessary, to impeach and remove a President or other Executive Branch official from office," Judge Judith Rogers wrote in the majority opinion. "Possession of relevant information is an essential precondition to the effective discharge of all of those duties."
One again they make no pretense to shutting down any real transparency.
Pompeo rejects Congressâ subpoenas for IG, Biden probe info
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday rejected congressional subpoenas issued for him and for the State Department to provide information and testimony to lawmakers about two politically charged developments. The refusals set the stage for an escalation in the confrontation between the State Department and the Democratic-controlled House ahead of Novemberâs elections.
In letters sent to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Pompeo and the State Departmentâs acting legislative affairs chief said they had no intention of complying with the subpoenas. They said the subpoenas were politically motivated, without merit, and unnecessary as the information and testimony could be otherwise obtained. The letters were obtained by The Associated Press shortly after they were sent to Capitol Hill.
While congressional subpoenas are legally binding, the Trump administration through various Cabinet agencies has repeatedly refused to comply with House demands with little consequence. There was no immediate response to the letters from the committee, although the panel later announced it was seeking testimony from another official in an unrelated matter.
In one letter, Pompeo said committee chairman, Rep. Eliot Engel of New York, was out of line in issuing the subpoenas, which he said were âoutrageousâ and ignored the State Departmentâs good faith efforts to answer questions about the firing of the departmentâs inspector general and the provision of Ukraine-related documents to Republican-controlled Senate committees.
Engel had issued the subpoenas on July 31 and Aug. 3, complaining that Pompeo and the State Department were âstonewallingâ repeated requests for information on both matters.
The first subpoena demanded that the State Department turn over to Engelâs committee copies of thousands of pages of documents he said the department had given to the Senate regarding former Vice President Joe Biden as well as his son, Hunter, for his work for a gas company in Ukraine while his father was vice president.
It also asked for internal department emails about responding to Congress. It said Pompeo had delivered more than 16,000 pages of records to the Senate but refused to send the same materials to the Democrat-led House.
In response, the State Departmentâs acting head of legislative affairs, Ryan Kaldahl, said the agency was not obliged to provide the documents to any committee not conducting its own investigation into the matter. He suggested that Engelâs committee seek copies from its Senate counterparts.
Kaldahl also said the committee had not shown that its demand was for a legitimate legislative purpose and suggested that it was entirely partisan. âThe department is unable to consider whether any accommodation is possible in response to the committeeâs requests unless the committee explains in detail its legislative purpose,â he wrote.
The second subpoena demanded the testimony of four senior State Department officials about the firing in May of department Inspector General Stephen Linick, which Democrats have alleged came in retaliation for probes the watchdog was conducting into Pompeo. Pompeo has denied knowledge of any investigation into his own conduct.
In rejecting that subpoena, Pompeo said in a letter to Engel that most of the officials in question, including the Under Secretary of State for Management Brian Bulatao and others, were prepared to be interviewed voluntarily and repeated that offer.
âMr. Bulatao and the other requested witnesses will appear and unambiguously refute your baseless accusations and provide full transparency before the elected representatives of the American people,â Pompeo wrote.
âFurthermore, let me express how outrageous it is for you to suggest that the depart,ent is âstonewallingâ any investigation into the presidentâs replacing of Steve Linick,â he wrote, citing at least four offers for Bulatao and others to appear before the committee.
Congressional aides have said those offers were unacceptable because they were contingent on dropping other avenues of inquiry.
Shortly after the letters were sent, Engel announced he was seeking testimony in an unrelated matter from the U.S. ambassador to Britain, Robert âWoodyâ Johnson on Sept. 30. Johnson is alleged to have tried to weigh in with British officials to move the British Open golf tournament to one of Trumpâs resorts and also is accused of inappropriate racist and sexist behavior.
This is not the first time Pompeo has rebuffed a House subpoena. He did not comply with a subpoena to provide documents during the Houseâs impeachment inquiry into Trump ast year, and several other Trump administration officials refused to testify in that probe.
The administrationâs record of complying with subpoenas is poor and has left congressional Democrats flustered with little recourse except in the courts.
The House Judiciary Committee sued former White House Counsel Donald McGahn for his refusal to testify about former special counsel Robert Muellerâs Russia report in April 2019, and that case has been tied up in courts. On Friday, an appeals court said that the committee can make the claim in court, reversing an earlier court decision.
While the decision was good news for the committee, the matter wonât be resolved any time soon. One of the dissenting judges in that case noted that the House session ends Jan. 3, and âthe chances that the committee hears McGahnâs testimony anytime soon are vanishingly slim.â
Re-upping this Profile on Pompeo from the New Yorker. Heâs a Koch brothers candidate, who has very limited experience in public service, who once derided Trump in 2016 as, âan authoritarian President who ignored our Constitution.â American soldiers âdonât swear an allegiance to President Trump or any other President,â in a comparison to Obama.
In Washington, Pompeo found a way onto the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the critical panel for the business interests of his Kansas patrons. He appointed a former Koch lawyer as his chief of staff and acquired a reputation as a fierce defender of the Kochs. âStop Harassing the Koch Brothersâ was the title of an op-ed that he wrote in 2012, in which he dismissed attacks on them as âevidence of a truly Nixonian approach to politics.â Two years later, he called the Kochs âgreat men.â His loyalty was rewarded: according to the Center for Responsive Politics, in 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 he received more campaign funds from the Kochsâ network than any other candidate in the country.
Watch: Acting DHS Sec. Wolf Testifies on Law Enforcement Deployed to Protests
AUGUST 6, 2020
Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee to discuss the involvement of federal law enforcementâs role in addressing ongoing unrest in Portland, Oregon, which began as protests after the death of George Floyd. Acting Secretary Wolf rejected claims that federal law enforcement were attacking peaceful protesters and asserted that federal officers were in Portland to protect federal property in that city. He also answered questions about reports the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was compiling intelligence reports on journalists, processing DACA applicants, ICE detention centers, and efforts to combat white supremacist extremism.
Featured Clip:
Watch Sen. Kamala Harris question Wolf about the impacts of the gas on the pregnant mothers at protests.
(Audio quality is poor, just FYI. If youâre sensitive, donât even try, hit cc)
Audio is better here in this abridged version.
Exclusive: Postal service inspector general reviewing DeJoyâs policy changes and potential ethics conflicts
The internal watchdog at the United States Postal Service is reviewing controversial policy changes recently imposed under Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, and is also examining DeJoyâs compliance with federal ethics rules, according to a spokeswoman for the USPS inspector general and an aide to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who requested the review.
Lawmakers from both parties and postal union leaders have sounded alarms over disruptive changes instituted by DeJoy this summer, including eliminating overtime and slowing some mail delivery. Democrats claim he is intentionally undermining postal service operations to sabotage mail-in voting in the November election â a charge he denies.
Agapi Doulaveris, a spokeswoman for the USPS watchdog, told CNN in an email, âWe have initiated a body of work to address the concerns raised, but cannot comment on the details.â
Last week, Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, and eight other Democratic lawmakers asked the inspector general to launch an inquiry into DeJoy on a number of fronts, including the nationwide policy changes heâs made since taking over in June, as well as whether DeJoy has "met all ethics requirements."
"We have learned that the United States Postal Service Office of the Inspector General is investigating all aspects of our request," Warren spokeswoman Saloni Sharma told CNN.
Itâs unclear if the inspector general has launched a full-scale investigation into possible politicization at USPS by DeJoy, a Trump ally and Republican donor, or if itâs just reviewing the matter for Congress.
Pelosi weighs bringing House back early to address Postal Service crisis
Democrats are looking to address organizational issues at the Postal Service in the coming weeks, not to provide additional funding at this time, according to sources familiar with the discussion.
One option would be to vote on a modified version of a bill introduced by House Oversight Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) earlier this week that would prohibit USPS from implementing a planned organizational overhaul that critics maintain would handicap mail-in voting.
Other top Democrats also floated addressing other issues, including expired federal unemployment benefits and voting rights. But Democratic sources said the immediate focus â at least for now â is preserving the Postal Service ahead of the election.
On Friday, Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) issued a scathing statement accusing President Donald Trump and Republicans of waging an âall-out assault on the Postal Service and its role in ensuring the integrity of the 2020 election.â Their statement came after Trump said he opposes a federal infusion of funds to save the flailing postal service because he doesnât support mail-in voting.
âThe President made plain that he will manipulate the operations of the Post Office to deny eligible voters the ballot in pursuit of his own re-election,â Pelosi and Schumer said. âThe Presidentâs own words confirm: he needs to cheat to win.â
Trump has suggested that heâs opposed to giving more money to the Postal Service because of the expected wave of millions of mail-in ballots in November due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Oh!
The Senate Intelligence Committee has sent a bipartisan letter to the Justice Department asking federal prosecutors to investigate Stephen K. Bannon, a former Trump confidant, for potentially lying to lawmakers during its investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The letter, a copy of which was reviewed by The Times, was signed by the panelâs then-chairman, Republican Sen. Richard M. Burr, and its ranking Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner.
It also raised concerns about testimony provided by family members and confidants of President Trump that appeared to contradict information provided by a former deputy campaign chairman to Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Those it identified as providing such conflicting testimony were the presidentâs son Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law Jared Kushner, former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks.
Press Release: Oversight Committee Calls Postmaster General to Testify at âUrgentâ Hearing on Sweeping Operational and Organizational Changes
Washington, D.C. (Aug. 16, 2020)âToday, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, the Chairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, invited Postmaster General Louis DeJoy to testify at an urgent hearing on Monday, August 24, 2020, on his sweeping operational and organizational changes at the Postal Service, which experts warn could degrade delivery standards, slow the mail, and potentially impair the rights of eligible Americans to cast their votes through the mail.
âOver the past several weeks, there have been startling new revelations about the scope and gravity of operational changes you are implementing at hundreds of postal facilities without consulting adequately with Congress, the Postal Regulatory Commission, or the Board of Governors,â Chairwoman Maloney wrote. âYour testimony is particularly urgent given the troubling influx of reports of widespread delays at postal facilities across the countryâas well as President Trumpâs explicit admission last week that he has been blocking critical coronavirus funding for the Postal Service in order to impair mail-in voting efforts for the upcoming elections in November.â
The hearing on Monday, August 24 will follow a deadline this coming Friday, August 21 for the Postmaster General to produce documents and information in response to a detailed, ten-page letter sent last week by Chairwoman Maloney, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, and the other Chairs and Ranking Members of the Committees with jurisdiction over the Postal Service and federal elections, Chairperson Zoe Lofgren of the Committee on House Administration, Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, and Ranking Member Gary C. Peters of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Chairwoman Maloney also requested the testimony of Robert M. Duncan, the Chairman of the U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors, which âdirects the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service, directs and controls its expenditures, reviews its practices, conducts long-range planning, approves officer compensation and sets policies on all postal matters.â
The hearing is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Monday, August 24, 2020, in room 2154 Rayburn and will be livestreamed.
Click here to read the invitation to Postmaster General DeJoy.
Click here to read the invitation to Chairman Duncan.