WTF Community

Day 1105

(Matt Kiser) #1

What happened today? Trump’s impeachment trial moved to written questions. Senate Republicans opened the day with Sens. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitt Romney – three Republicans who have hinted they could vote to hear from witnesses – asking Trump’s legal team how they should consider abuse of power if Trump had “had more than one motive for his alleged conduct.” Trump attorney Patrick Philbin argued that if there were a motive “of the public interest, but also some personal interest,” then it “cannot possibly be the basis for an impeachable offense.” Trump’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz also argued that because Trump’s re-election is in the public interest, if Trump “does something that he thinks will help him get elected” – and even if he had political motivations to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens – it “cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said it was unlikely that Democrats will be able to win over enough Republican votes to call witnesses and documents. Republican leaders, meanwhile, signaled that they were confident that they would be able to block new witnesses and documents and bring the trial to an acquittal verdict as soon as Friday.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

The Impeachment of President Donald J. Trump
split this topic #2

A post was merged into an existing topic: The Impeachment of President Donald J. Trump


I never thought in America, that a legal reasoning of Trump’s conduct would include the idea that Trump’s self-interest in getting re-elected IS in the nation’s best interest, and therefore isn’t impeachable. What Dershowitz described is the reasoning of a dictator, plain and simple.

(Dale field) #4

Thank you, well said.

(Matt Kiser) closed #5

This topic was automatically closed 15 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.