WTF Community

Day 769

WSJ disagrees at least partially (for ident of exec 2)

BlockquoteThe Journal has previously identified “Executive-1” as Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg. Mr. Cohen testified today that “Executive-2” in the charging document was Donald Trump Jr.

However, according to people familiar with the matter, the second executive was Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney, not the president’s son. Mr. McConney previously referred requests for comment by the Journal to a Trump organization representative, who declined to comment.

2 Likes

I’m sure many stories will be written about this after today. Put a pin in it. :pushpin:

2 Likes

A couple of powerful remarks from Obama AG Eric Holder

These two are the kicker…

3 Likes

Listening to the GOP questioning just now reminded of this song:
Replace all “grown ups” with …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcvoC3u__xs

2 Likes

Merging this thread into today’s main post, y’all!

4 Likes

Yes, in a matter of minutes AOC brought to the Oversight Committee’s attention several new inquiries with which this committee may pursue further.

She’s smart, knows the system, and takes no prisoners. She is a force to be reckoned with.

Nice job AOC.

4 Likes

One more thing… image

5 Likes

@dragonfly9 Glad you spotted this intriguing story in the middle of today’s tsunami of news. Wow, this makes three separate investigations into Trump’s Inaugural Committee: By the Feds in Manhattan, the Attorney General in New Jersey, and now the Attorney General in Washington, D.C. If anyone on the committee did commit crimes, they must be really sweating it. :sweat:

Your lead took me to NYT’s reporting. The paragraph below jumped out at me.

The subpoena requests documents identifying what role three of Mr. Trump’s adult children — Ivanka Trump, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump — played on the committee. None of them had any official role in running the committee, which was overseen by Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a billionaire and friend of Mr. Trump.

So Ivanka, Don Jr., and Eric were not listed anywhere on the official org chart, yet the D.C. Attorney General is now asking what role they played on the committee!? An AG doesn’t randomly pursue lines of inquiry like this; his investigators must have some inkling of clandestine (and possibly illegal) activities by Trump’s kids related to the committee – no fire here yet, but there’s a lot more smoke billowing out of the White House.

4 Likes

Enjoying this sum up piece from The Atlantic: Uncontradicted

Michael Cohen’s testimony to the House Oversight Committee was uncontradicted. The former personal attorney of the president of the United States today accused him of a litany of crimes, improprieties, immoralities, and betrayals of national security. And not one Republican member of the committee breathed one word in defense of the leader of their party.

2 Likes

Good catch, I just want pull this neat little list out of that article

Those Republicans have learned the hard way never to trust President Donald Trump’s denials.

(…)

Did he direct payoffs to a porn star? Trump denied it. It was true.

Was the Trump Organization pursuing a hotel project in Moscow while he was running for president? Trump denied it. That was true too.

Did his campaign meet with someone claiming to be an agent of the Russian state to seek dirt on Hillary Clinton? Denied. True.

Was there fraud at the Trump Foundation? Denied. True.

Thanks for the extra linkage @Keaton_James and further details on this other ‘area’ of deep exploration. The kids are all being lined up (I believe) for some kind of indictments and this is just another layer of how devious they have been.

That Junior and Eric were up to something of course is not surprising. It is the big windup for what I believe will be a :boom: moment for the T kids. They are in deep.

There’s been some written on Ivanka and how she had the cost of renting any of the T properties rooms/ballrooms way up during the Inaugural period.

According to reporting by WNYC and ProPublica, President Donald Trump’s inaugural committee paid large sums of money to the Trump organization to host events at the Trump-owned property, and the president’s daughter discussed charging $175,000 per day for the space, despite organizers’ concerns that it would look like the Trumps were lining their pockets.

During the planning, Ivanka Trump, the president-elect’s eldest daughter and a senior executive with the Trump Organization, was involved in negotiating the price the hotel charged the 58th Presidential Inaugural Committee for venue rentals. A top inaugural planner emailed Ivanka and others at the company to “express my concern” that the hotel was overcharging for its event spaces, worrying of what would happen “when this is audited.”

If the Trump hotel charged more than the going rate for the venues, it could violate tax law. The inaugural committee’s payments to the Trump Organization and Ivanka Trump’s role have not been previously reported or disclosed in public filings.

As planning for the inauguration was underway in December 2016, Ivanka Trump was still an executive vice president at the Trump Organization. But she was reportedly preparing to move to Washington and take on a greater public role. She now serves as an adviser to the president.

Around the middle of the month, with Inauguration Day scarcely a month away, Ivanka Trump was asked to help resolve a dispute between inaugural planners and her family’s Washington hotel, according to emails.

The problem: Organizers thought the hotel was charging too much money.

Emails show that Ivanka Trump connected Gates with Mickael Damelincourt, managing director of the hotel. Damelincourt responded with a new rate of $175,000 per day for use of the Presidential Ballroom and meeting rooms, offering a $700,000 charge for four days of use.

The inaugural committee spent money at the Trump International in Washington in other ways as well. Many workers came from California and New York and stayed at the hotel, eating their meals there and holding meetings. Receipts reviewed by WNYC and ProPublica show they typically paid about $350 a night. According to an inaugural worker, 15 to 20 inaugural workers stayed at the hotel most nights for roughly a month in the run-up to the inauguration, at a total cost of what could be more than $200,000.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/trump-inc-trump-inauguration-paid-trumps-company-with-ivanka-middle

and all the money that the Inaugural Committee was pulling in…for a total of $107 Million

3 Likes

Ocasio-Cortez says bartending prepared her to cross-examine Michael Cohen

Bartending + waitressing (especially in NYC) means you talk to 1000s of people over the years," the freshman congresswoman tweeted. "Forces you to get great at reading people + hones a razor-sharp BS detector.

“Just goes to show that what some consider to be ‘unskilled labor’ can actually be anything but.”

4 Likes

From NYT reporter - read the insert

(and someone must be lying…)

1 Like

Yes! This is what a real voter fraud investigation looks like. Dowless undoubtedly will flip in a heartbeat on the Republican candidate who hired him. That candidate, Mark Harris, lied at the public hearing, saying he had no idea that Dowless was known for committing voter fraud. We know he lied because his own son, an assistant U.S. attorney, took the stand and testified how he warned his father about Dowless; his warnings are documented in emails. Now, assuming Dowless starts singing (he has every motivation to do so), we’ll find out if he spoke directly to Harris about his voter fraud schemes.

The political operative at the center of allegations of ballot-tampering in a congressional race in North Carolina has been indicted on seven felonies, the start of what is expected to grow into one of the most sweeping criminal investigations ever of fraud in a federal election.

Leslie McCrae Dowless, who worked for Mark Harris, the Republican nominee in the state’s 9th Congressional District last year, was arrested and charged with three counts of obstruction of justice, two counts of conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice and two counts of possession of absentee ballots, according to the Wake County district attorney’s office in Raleigh.

The charges reflect a swift transition to the criminal phase of an investigation of mail-in ballot irregularities in the 9th District, following hearings last week before the State Board of Elections…

Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman’s decision to seek indictments almost immediately after the close of those hearings sent a “clear signal,” she said, “that we take seriously the public’s confidence in the electoral process and that we intend to pursue this case vigorously and see that justice is done.”

More charges are likely, Freeman said. She said her office’s “very large-scope” investigation will examine “who was aware of and helped finance these fraudulent absentee ballot activities” — a sign of potential legal peril for Harris, who hired Dowless. She also plans to determine whether anyone else besides Dowless allegedly tried to obstruct either the criminal or state board investigations…

Harris has claimed no knowledge of Dowless’s methods and said there were no red flags before he hired him in 2017. However, he was contradicted during last week’s hearings by his son John, an assistant U.S. attorney who testified that he warned his father in conversations and emails in 2017 against hiring Dowless because he suspected the operative had used illegal tactics to win votes in a previous election.

2 Likes

This bananas news day is not yet over:

Stone is grasping at straws. He called for a hearing in which he hoped to prove that the FBI leaked details of his impending arrest. After examining all the facts, Judge Jackson said no such hearing is warranted. In other words, Stone didn’t even get to square one with this bogus allegation/distraction.

A D.C. federal judge rejected a motion Wednesday from GOP operative Roger Stone claiming that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team tipped off CNN before his Jan. 25 morning arrest.

Stone had petitioned Judge Amy Berman Jackson to hold a hearing demanding that prosecutors “show cause” for why they were not in contempt of court for allegedly leaking a copy of the indictment to the press. A CNN news crew captured Stone’s arrest on video, after having a team stake out the spin artist’s Florida home.

But exhibits Stone provided “supplied no reason to believe that any contempt of court had occurred,” Berman Jackson wrote in the order, adding that evidence and filings he introduced into the record “demonstrate that there is no basis” to issue a contempt order.

:balance_scale:

3 Likes

The Lawfare Blog Podcast made a super cut of all the important moments from Cohen’s appearance before Congress. If you missed out but don’t want to binge five hours of testimony, than this is for you! It’s about an hour, skip around as you please.

On Wednesday, Michael Cohen—the former executive vice president of the Trump Organization, former deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee, and former personal lawyer to Donald Trump—paid a visit to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. Cohen accused the president of campaign finance violations after taking office. He alleged that he was present when Roger Stone gave Trump advance notice of the WikiLeaks dump of the hacked DNC emails. And he claimed that the president’s statements in a meeting with Jay Sekulow led Cohen to conclude that the president wanted Cohen to make false statements to Congress. So we cut out all of the bickering, all of the procedural obstructions, and all the rest of the frivolity, to bring you just the one hour of testimony you need to hear.

3 Likes

Totally agree. Full disclosure: I’m not aligned with some of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s policy positions, but I have great respect for her and was tremendously impressed with her line of questioning and composure today (compare and contrast with Rep. Jordon’s childish performance). Her approach was refreshing and incisive. She didn’t grandstand; she was efficient, clear, and straight forward. Most importantly, she addressed the issues of possible tax fraud and financial crimes while, at the same time, she laid out a persuasive case for why the House needs to take steps to examine Trump’s tax returns.

Here’s a fine recap and analysis of her testimony with a video link:

1 Like

Agree wholeheartedly…she was positively surgical in her questions and uncovered ‘sticky’ areas for further inquiry. The fact she was so adept at both being strategically sound and adept at getting her points across is a win.

Several of the new Democratic women’s wing of Congress are so very smart and their questions proved it…others include Rep. Katie Hill, Rep Katie Porter with Equifax yesterday and Rep. Rashida Tlaib did great. The latter may have stepped over some boundaries, but she cracked open the discussion even more.

So out of the gate, AOC’s strategy to speak her conscious at times, and level the playing field is refreshing. Because she is showing a lot of political courage and ability, she may get similar respect as Pelosi has. It is still early though. But the R’s know for sure that they have some very strong and worthy opponents and need to watch it.

3 Likes

No surprises here…

Trump and Kim abruptly cut short summit after failing to reach nuclear deal

President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un abruptly cut short their two-day summit here Thursday after the two leaders failed to reach an agreement to dismantle that country’s nuclear weapons.

Although Kim said he was ready in principle to denuclearize, he and Trump ended their meetings without sitting for a planned lunch and without participating in a joint signing ceremony.

3 Likes

Some highlights:

President Trump told reporters in Hanoi he and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un did not sign an agreement as scheduled largely because they disagreed on sanctions.

Mr. Trump, fielding reporters’ questions after the White House abruptly announced the summit would be cut short, explained, “Sometimes you have to walk.” Mr. Trump said he and U.S. leaders decided walking away would be better than giving away too much…

No next summit scheduled at this point, Trump says

Mr. Trump said there is no next summit scheduled with Kim at this point.

That can’t be a good sign.

Trump accepts Kim Jong Un’s claim to innocence regarding Otto Warmbier

A reporter asked Mr. Trump if he has brought up Otto Warmbier, the American who died after being in the custody of North Koreans.

Mr. Trump, in a stunning claim for a U.S. president, said he doesn’t believe the top leadership knew and he doesn’t believe Kim knew. Mr. Trump claimed Kim said he was unaware.

"I will take him at his word," Mr. Trump said.

At least Trump is consistent in naively accepting the word of ruthless autocrats and dictators. He took Putin’s word that he did not attack our 2016 election process. He took Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman’s word that he did not order the heinous torture, assassination and dismemberment of U.S. resident and Washington Post journalist, Jamal Khashoggi. And now he’s taking Kim Jong Un’s word that he knew nothing about the brutalization of U.S. college student Otto Warmbeir that left him brain dead and led to his subsequent death.

Trump criticizes South Korea for not funding joint military exercises

Mr. Trump, asked if he would bring back joint military exercises with South Korea, said those exercises are exceedingly expensive. The U.S., he said, is saving lots of money.

Mr. Trump then appeared to criticize South Korea for not paying more for those military exercises.

The big takeaway here is not whether or not South Korea should help fund the exercises, but the fact that Trump is now apparently abandoning them permanently. Why not bring them back until Kim makes some concessions? This is a huge giveaway by Trump and he’s getting nothing in return.

Pompeo: We are closer to goals with North Korea than 36 hours ago

Mr. Trump invited Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to the podium, where Pompeo said he believes they are closer – he didn’t say closer to what – now than 36 hours ago.

A meaningless platitude.

Trump responds to Cohen hearing

Mr. Trump, asked about a hearing hours earlier with his former attorney Michael Cohen, blasted Democrats for holding the hearing during his summit with Kim.

"I think having a fake hearing like that and having it in the middle of this very important summit is really a terrible thing," Mr. Trump said.

The president claimed Cohen “lied a lot” but the hearing was very interesting.

The president then launched into his frustrations with the Russia investigation, claiming there is no collusion.

First, there’s no way that Cohen’s testimony affected the outcome of this doomed summit even one iota. Second, it seems inconsistent for Trump to call this a “very important summit” and then exploit it as a platform to complain about being investigated. If he cared about the summit, he’d stay on message and save his criticism of the Democrats until he returns home tomorrow.

Trump has insisted he isn’t interested in speed

“I’ve been saying very much from the beginning that speed is not that important to me,” the president said as he sat down with Kim earlier in Hanoi. “I very much appreciate no testing of nuclear rockets, missiles, any of it. Very much appreciate it.

Two things to note:

  • North Korea has suspended missile testing in the past and nothing came of it (1999 - 2005).

  • As this recent Politico article points out: “Despite a pause in nuclear and missile tests, North Korea’s nuclear program is in fact advancing by the day.”

More from the Politico article:

… While there have been no nuclear- or ballistic-missile tests since 2017, the program is far from frozen; all evidence suggests that North Korea continues to upgrade and expand its nuclear weapon and missile infrastructure…

Here is what we know: North Korea continues to produce fissile material, enabling it to build increasing numbers of nuclear weapons. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo confirmed as much in Senate testimony last summer. A recent expert report estimated that in 2018, North Korea developed enough plutonium and highly enriched uranium to build up to 7 additional nuclear weapons and that the regime continued to advance “all phases” of its weapons program. As recently as November, the International Atomic Energy Agency observed expanded operations at Yongbyon, the North’s main facility producing fissile material.

North Korea also continues to expand its missile development and production facilities. And as researchers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies have shown using satellite imagery, Pyongyang maintains as many as 20 undeclared ballistic-missile bases where it continues to advance its missile program. North Korea will not negotiate over elements of the program it does not disclose.

Bottom line: Despite his colossal buildup to this summit, Trump has won zero new concessions from North Korea. At the same time he appears to have made a significant concession to Kim: He strongly implied that we’re permanently surrendering the annual joint military exercises with South Korea (previously, it looked like we were just skipping one while we were waiting for the talks to progress). Trump has also further legitimized Kim’s brutal regime on the world stage by sharing the spotlight with him. Meanwhile Kim has bought more time to advance North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs and, based on their proven track record, they will likely resume testing whenever it suits them.

Sadly, it’s hard to find an upside here.

3 Likes