WTF Community

Who The Fuck Has Left The Trump Administration

It will be revealed within the week, and it can not be contained.

Pence is a suspect - due to the use of the word Lodestar
Gen Kelly & Mattis - already on record to be disgruntled.

White House Searches For Anonymous Inside Critic
Aides chase rumors of who could have written opinion piece on alleged effort within administration to thwart Trump’s impulses

By
Michael C. Bender
Sept. 5, 2018 7:17 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON—White House aides launched a search for the anonymous author of an opinion column who claimed Wednesday to be part of a secret group of officials inside the administration acting as a check on President Trump’s “worst inclinations.

An angry president called the New York Times piece “a disgrace” and slammed its author as “gutless.”

The writer was identified only as a senior administration official. A New York Times spokeswoman declined to comment when asked for a description of that term.

“This is the stuff we have to deal with, and, you know, the dishonest media,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House when asked about the column. The president was ready for the question, pulling a sheet of paper from his suit-jacket pocket and responding with a list of what he said were his administration’s accomplishments, including low unemployment.

Later in the afternoon, Mr. Trump tweeted a video of his response to the op-ed and followed it with a second tweet that read simply, “TREASON?”

Inside the West Wing, top officials canceled afternoon meetings and huddled behind closed doors to strategize about how to expose the author, White House officials said. Some officials called reporters to chase down rumors about who was behind the op-ed, and whether it came from inside the White House or a cabinet-level agency.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement that the op-ed was written by a “gutless, anonymous source.” Both she and Mr. Trump referred to the Times as “failing,” despite statistics from the company showing subscriptions have increased since his election.

“The individual behind this piece has chosen to deceive, rather than support, the duly elected president of the United States,” Ms. Sanders said. "He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people. This coward should do the right thing and resign.”

Since its inception, the Trump administration has included some senior officials—both conservative and more liberal—who have sought to curb Mr. Trump’s direction, according to people familiar with the matter.

Steve Bannon, the president’s former chief strategist and a self-described economic populist, directed junior staffers to ignore direct orders from the president, these people said. On trade policy, Gary Cohn, his former top economic adviser and a registered Democrat, often slowed the president’s attempts to implement his protectionist instincts, these people said.

The hunt for the anonymous writer came on a day when the White House was busy responding to the author of the latest critical book about the Trump presidency.

Coverage of the new manuscript from Bob Woodward, a Washington Post editor and author of a dozen best-selling nonfiction books, was being closely monitored by the president.

In the White House earlier on Wednesday, reporters asked Mr. Trump about a trade deal he plans to sign with South Korea later this month. The president responded by referring to a passage in Mr. Woodward’s book alleging that Mr. Cohn removed papers from the Oval Office desk that would have pulled the U.S. out of the Korea Free Trade Agreement before Mr. Trump could sign them.

“I read another phony thing in the book about the trade deal, that certain people didn’t want me to look at,” he said. “That was another thing in the book that was just totally false.”

Mr. Trump on Wednesday also referred reporters to a pair of statements released on Tuesday from chief of staff John Kelly and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis that disputed the disparaging quotes in the book that they allegedly made in private about the president. Mr. Trump’s former attorney, John Dowd, also disavowed statements attributed to him in the book.

Mr. Mattis, who was cited in the book as saying the president’s understanding of global affairs was that of a “fifth- or sixth-grader,” called the passage a “product of someone’s rich imagination.”

“The contemptuous words about the president attributed to me in Woodward’s book were never uttered by me,” he said in the statement.

Mr. Trump Wednesday offered differing accounts about how those statements came to be released.

At about 2 p.m., he told reporters that he was surprised by the statements from Messrs. Kelly and Mattis, saying they were released “without my even knowing about it.”

Two hours later, he told reporters he had approached Gen. Mattis about the book and his defense secretary offered to put out a statement disputing the book’s descriptions of him. “And I said, ‘Thank you very much, that’s very kind,’” Mr. Trump told reporters.

Mr. Woodward’s book, entitled, “Fear: Trump in the White House,” is scheduled for publication on Sept.

3 Likes

The White House launches another witch hunt to track down the anonymous author of a New York Times Op-ed. I stand by my assertion that the White House does not know which witch is which. :smirk:

WASHINGTON—White House aides launched a search for the anonymous author of an opinion column who claimed Wednesday to be part of a secret group of officials inside the administration acting as a check on President Trump’s “worst inclinations.”

An angry president called the New York Times piece “a disgrace” and slammed its author as “gutless.”

Later in the afternoon, Mr. Trump tweeted a video of his response to the op-ed and followed it with a second tweet that read simply, “TREASON?”

Inside the West Wing, top officials canceled afternoon meetings and huddled behind closed doors to strategize about how to expose the author, White House officials said. Some officials called reporters to chase down rumors about who was behind the op-ed, and whether it came from inside the White House or a cabinet-level agency.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement that the op-ed was written by a “gutless, anonymous source.” Both she and Mr. Trump referred to the Times as “failing,” despite statistics from the company showing subscriptions have increased since his election.

“The individual behind this piece has chosen to deceive, rather than support, the duly elected president of the United States,” Ms. Sanders said. "He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people. This coward should do the right thing and resign.”

3 Likes

@dragonfly9 you beat me by 6mins. Must have been while I was typing. :woman_facepalming:t2:

1 Like

Wha??? LOL

All of us are in ISO (IN SEARCH OF) mode to understand this fast moving cRa*
Adrenalin is pumping, right?

I go thru twitter, and came across Bender’s article, and snatched it, before it went behind it’s paywall.

So…yes, we are on the same search…eyes popping, and fingers scrambling.

Yikes, where is the actual straw in this pile-up that will break his back? When will it end? :boom:

Now onto cartoons, friend @Pet_Proletariat

3 Likes

Today is pretty crazytown. This really is the golden age of television. :smirk:

3 Likes

oooop this was already posted by @Keaton_James (I was reading on a cyber group’s recommendation for using paper ballots…and came across this.)

Aug 4th - Who the Fuck Left the WH

Not sure this is a group that we can not afford to lose. I do not know who the names are of the top four FBI Cyber officials. But it looks grim. :open_mouth:

The recent departures of four top FBI cyber officials reflect a troubling trend: The bureau is losing its most seasoned agents and supervisors tasked with disrupting digital threats from Russia and elsewhere, even as threats to the nation’s power grid and elections grow.

Close to 20 top FBI cybersecurity leaders have left for high-paying corporate jobs over the past five years, one former veteran agent told POLITICO — a dramatic turnover in a handful of senior jobs. And news of the most recent retirements followed the abrupt departure of the co-head of the FBI’s newly formed election meddling task force.

The exodus — including departures from the FBI’s Cyber Division — worries current and former bureau officials. It’s also prompting concern from several top congressional Democrats, who asked their committees’ chairmen last week to get assurances from FBI Director Christopher Wray “that the agency has a plan to replace the departing staff, and that the safety of our elections will not suffer in the interim.”

3 Likes

Mass exodus from the EPA has shrunk the agency’s workforce by 8 percent

During the first 18 months of the Trump administration, records show, nearly 1,600 workers left the EPA, while fewer than 400 were hired. The exodus has shrunk the agency’s workforce by 8 percent, to levels not seen since the Reagan administration. The trend has continued even after a major round of buyouts last year and despite the fact that the EPA’s budget has remained stable.

Those who have resigned or retired include some of the agency’s most experienced veterans, as well as young environmental experts who traditionally would have replaced them — stirring fears about brain drain at the EPA. The sheer number of departures also has prompted concerns over what sort of work is falling by the wayside, from enforcement investigations to environmental research.

According to data released under the Freedom of Information Act and analyzed by The Washington Post, at least 260 scientists, 185 “environmental protection specialists” and 106 engineers are gone.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/with-a-shrinking-epa-trump-delivers-on-his-promise-to-cut-government/2018/09/08/6b058f9e-b143-11e8-a20b-5f4f84429666_story.html?utm_term=.33398540ea4b

5 Likes

Retired Admiral William “Bill” McRaven, the former head of Special Operations Command resigned from the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board last month, just days after issuing a stunning rebuke of President Donald Trump’s decision to revoke the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan, the Pentagon confirmed Thursday.

“I can confirm that Admiral (ret) William H. McRaven resigned from the Defense Innovation Board, effective August 20, 2018,” Pentagon spokesperson Heather Babb told CNN in a statement. “The Department appreciates his service and contribution on the board.”

While his departure was first reported by Defense News on Thursday, the Pentagon confirmed that McRaven officially resigned last month, just four days after he authored a blistering op-ed in the Washington Post slamming Trump’s decision to revoke Brennan’s clearance.

I salute McRaven – he has the courage to stand up for his convictions. He put our nation’s security before his own personal interests. The fact that Trump has set a precedent of revoking security clearances as an act of political retribution weakens our intelligence services, our military, and our government. He sounded the alarm, knowing it would cost him dearly. I only wish that Republicans in congress would show the same resolve to protect our country from the imminent threat posed by our unhinged President.

5 Likes

Holy shit!!

2 Likes

Trent Teyama, FBI’s section chief for cyber readiness and COO - Cyber Division.

Speculating that given there is no strong mandate within T’s administration to curtail the war on cyber, election hacking etc., it might be time before mid-terms to cut out. Oh, and the money is always much better.

Trent is leaving for Parsons.

Trent Teyema, the FBI’s section chief for cyber readiness and chief operating officer of the bureau’s Cyber Division, has been named senior vice president and chief technology officer for the government-focused wing of Parsons Corporation.

The move comes as a number of cybersecurity experts at the bureau have left their positions over recent months. In July, the Wall Street Journal reported that a number of top-ranking cybersecurity officials were leaving for various roles in the private sector.

The FBI’s cyber readiness team works to educate enterprises on various cyberthreats and coordinate information-sharing initiatives. During his time at the bureau, Teyema helped establish the FBI’s National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force, which is responsible for investigating cyberthreats that pose the most harm to the country.

Teyema also spent time as the director of cybersecurity policy at the National Security Council from 2010 to 2011.

2 Likes

Rod Rosentein has offered his resignation.

Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, was considering resigning on Monday, days after private discussions were revealed in which he talked about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office and secretly taping him to expose chaos in the administration.

Over the weekend, Mr. Rosenstein called a White House official and said he was considering quitting, and a person close to the White House said he was resigning. On Monday morning, Mr. Rosenstein was on his way to the White House to meet with Mr. Trump’s chief of staff, John F. Kelly.

Mr. Trump was in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, and it was not clear whether he would accept a resignation, fire Mr. Rosenstein or allow him to remain in the job.

Update:

President Donald Trump will meet with Rod Rosenstein Thursday after the deputy attorney general went to the White House Monday expecting to be fired.

Rosenstein met with chief of staff John Kelly and spoke with Trump, who is in New York.

“At the request of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, he and President Trump had an extended conversation to discuss the recent news stories,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement. “Because the President is at the United Nations General Assembly and has a full schedule with leaders from around the world, they will meet on Thursday when the President returns to Washington, DC.”

3 Likes

If this is true, I’m extremely disappointed in Rosenstein. He should be fighting this tooth and nail. First, my understanding is that his remarks about recording Trump were sarcastic, but even if they weren’t, there’s no harm in discussing various contingencies in the face of a crisis which is where the DOJ found itself after the firing of Comey.

Anyone who has worked in business, politics, or the military knows that contingencies are discussed all the time – it’s called brainstorming. A group charged with finding a solution for an intractable problem is, in fact, remiss in its duties if it doesn’t brainstorm. At the beginning of the path toward a viable solution many possible courses of action are be placed on the table and then, by a process of elimination and creative thinking, the best solution is selected – it’s simply good process management to do so. It would be another matter if Rosenstein went further down the path of recording Trump (for example, a detailed memo or Powerpoint presentation was produced that showed an actual plan for doing so), but my understanding is, this is not the case.

This morning, some commentators are trying to put a good face on Rosenstein’s possible departure, saying it wouldn’t really affect the Mueller investigation that much. I strongly disagree. Mueller reports to the Attorney General (or in the present case, the Deputy AG, since Sessions has recused himself – for the purposes of this discussion, I’ll just call that person “Mueller’s boss”).

Mueller’s boss can interfere with the investigation in many ways, for example reducing the budget, denying requests to follow leads that may extend beyond the initial scope of the investigation, etc. And ultimately Mueller’s boss can fire Mueller. (see footnote 1)

In addition, following the normal line of succession, Rosenstein’s replacement replacement would be Noel Francisco, "a longtime conservative lawyer with ties to the White House. You can bet he will do Trump’s bidding.

And just as importantly, when Mueller produces his report, it goes to his boss who then decides whether or not it will be made public. I’m not sure that Rosenstein would make it public, but I’m darn sure his replacement would not. I want to read every single word of that report! (see footnote 2)

So I feel there is really no way to put a good face on this. Rosenstein’s departure would, at the least, impede the investigation and, at worst, bring it to a virtual halt and keep the findings secret.

Come on, Rosenstein, stand up and fight this!

Footnotes

  1. From Politico:

As the Justice Department authority overseeing the investigation, Francisco could narrow its parameters or deny specific requests to prevent Mueller from looking into Trump’s personal and business affairs. He would also assume control of Mueller’s budget.

(A shout out to @hippopotatomus and @dragonfly9 for calling attention to this way back in April.)

  1. Also from Politico:

Under the special counsel regulations guiding his appointment, Mueller would submit his report to Rosenstein, not to Congress or the public. And under those regulations, his report will remain confidential unless Rosenstein decides to release it.

4 Likes

On today’s episode of the The Daily podcast, Michael S. Schmidt, disagreed, citing sources within the room that said the comment wasn’t sarcastic but that they may have been spitballing ideas.

3 Likes

Exactly! I was a little unhappy with the initial reporting on this because it seemed as if journalists were limiting themselves to a binary assessment: Rosenstein was either plotting or joking. But the third possibility, that he was spit balling or brainstorming, is the most reasonable to me and is certainly not cause for resigning or being fired. We still don’t know the full story, but I’m glad that the press is waking up to the fact that there are more than just two possible explanations for Rosenstein’s remarks.

BTW, thanks for the podcast link – will check it out.

2 Likes

I agree…not certain that Rosenstein was sarcastic. A lot of the commentary today (MSNBC - Morning Joe, etc) has been stating that within the 8 day period between Comey’s firing and Rosenstein’s final decision to get Mueller in there, the reporters are remarking that Rosenstein was upended by this firing. Rosenstein was put into the hot public spotlight, feared for the worse that indeed T had corrupt intentions and thought to maybe wiretap him, calling for the 25th amendment.

Reporters (Matt Miller, former DOJ spokesperson, MSNBC contributor and by not saying too much until The Daily - author Michael Schmidt) were stating that it would have been known to Rosenstein that the 25th Amendment would have been a steep hill to climb, with the need to get all the cabinet on board, as well as the President’s consent. As far as wiretapping, that set off alarm bells because the only time one would do that is if you had suspicions you were dealing with a criminal. And could Rosenstein walk that one back…? Not sure he can…

Rosenstein is going to be leaving sometime in the near future. The pundits are all expecting that Mueller would be in “clear the embassy” mode, ie - need to leave asap, forward all important materials to outside DA’s and get your affairs in order.

It is going to be a helluva week…may we all have a lot of shock absorbers. :oncoming_automobile::fire:

4 Likes

Domestic Policy Council Director Andrew Bremberg is leaving the White House at the end of the year, three sources familiar with his plans told POLITICO.

Bremberg, who has been with the administration since President Donald Trump’s election, will be nominated as the next ambassador to the United Nations Mission in Geneva, an administration official and two people close to the White House said.

The move ends a nearly two-year tenure for Bremberg atop the president’s Domestic Policy Council, where he played a central role in the White House’s broad deregulation effort and was involved in coordinating the GOP’s major policy initiatives — including its failed attempts to repeal Obamacare.

1 Like

EPA will eliminate Office of the Science Advisor

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency plans to dissolve its Office of the Science Advisor, a senior post that was created to counsel the E.P.A. administrator on the scientific research underpinning health and environmental regulations, according to a person familiar with the agency’s plans. The person spoke anonymously because the decision had not yet been made public.

The science adviser works across the agency to ensure that the highest quality science is integrated into the agency’s policies and decisions, according to the E.P.A.’s website. The move is the latest among several steps taken by the Trump administration that appear to have diminished the role of scientific research in policymaking while the administration pursues an agenda of rolling back regulations.

Asked about the E.P.A.’s plans, John Konkus, a spokesman for the agency, emailed a prepared statement from the science adviser, Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, in which she described the decision to dissolve the office as one that would “combine offices with similar functions” and “eliminate redundancies.

After dissolving the office of the scientific adviser, Mr. Wheeler plans to merge the position into an office that reports to the E.P.A.’s Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science, a demotion that would put at least two more managerial layers between the E.P.A.’s chief scientist and its top decision maker.

3 Likes

U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday lost another senior level official in his administration with the resignation of Jeff Pon, director of the Office of Personnel Management, which oversees the federal government workforce.

The move appeared to have been sudden. As recently as Thursday, Pon had issued a statement about modernizing the federal workforce. On Friday, the OPM had not yet removed his biography and statements from its website.

Trump named Margaret Weichert, the Office of Management and Budget’s deputy director for management, to be the acting OPM director, the White House said. Weichert will continue in her OMB role at the same time, the White House said.

2 Likes

Soft landing…Hope Hicks will move to Fox News.

Let’s not forget she was part of the conspiracy to cover up the true purpose of the Trump Tower meeting – she’s undoubtedly in line for an indictment if she hasn’t already made a deal.

4 Likes