WTF Community

🔍 All things Mueller - What we know he has on Trump 'n Co

It’s all one big counterintelligence investigation so the gang of eight will be informed regardless of the criminal report that goes to AG Barr. The daily beast explains below. :point_down:

The most public and familiar one is as a criminal investigator under the special counsel regulations. But Mueller has also carried a second charge, as a counterintelligence expert, with a much broader charge to determine and report the scope of any interference and any links to the Trump campaign—what Trump himself might refer to as “collusion.”

In March 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey testified that the Russia investigation was commenced “as part of our counterintelligence mission . . . also includ[ing] an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s May 17, 2017 order appointing Mueller special counsel specifically and carefully incorporated this announced scope and mission.

From the start, then, Mueller has been conducting a counterintelligence investigation, while “also” assessing whether any crimes were committed. Not the other way around.

Comey and Rosenstein knew what they were doing. It is the mission of a criminal investigation to produce indictments and trials, which tell stories and render conclusions only imperfectly. Thanks to the special counsel regulations, there is also “a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions.” But what will go into this report and what the Congress and public may ultimately see is highly proscribed.

It is the central mission of a counterintelligence investigation, however, to produce . . . well, a report. These findings and conclusions are shared with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and relevant agencies of the 17-member intelligence community (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.). The report may be honed into a formal IC “assessment” reflecting the consensus view of the 17 agencies. It was just such a report, “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections,” that on Jan. 7, 2017 was shared with incoming President Trump. Its disclosure brought into public view the Intelligence Community’s bombshell conclusion that Vladimir Putin had personally ordered an effort to discredit Hillary Clinton and to “help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”

Significantly, unlike a final criminal report, a Mueller counterintelligence report cannot be bottled up. By statute it must be shared with Congress. The House and Senate intelligence committees are legally entitled to be given reports, in writing, of significant intelligence and counterintelligence activities or failures. Mueller’s findings will certainly qualify.

Where matters are too delicate to share with all the members of the intelligence committees, statute and established practice provide that disclosure may be made to a smaller circle known as the “Gang of Eight:” the chair and ranking member of each intelligence committee, and the Democratic and Republican leaders of each chamber.

5 Likes

Commentary

@Matt had commented in yesterday’s newsfeed (day 781) -

Is it just me or has the news cycle been a little off lately? I feel like there hasn’t been a lot “hard news” (i.e. things signed; actions taken), but rather a lot of news that is on the soft side

To me it feels like we are in a waiting room, off to the side, awaiting to hear about the patient, and let’s call it Patient X. When the Mueller Report drops, when the indictments fall, when more is presented as knowable truths of the corruption from the T administration (or not) we will have a much clearer state of the union.

There have been so many shoes dropped, awaiting the ‘drop,’ etc. We get all sorts of indications that many people have been doing some really unsavory/illegal/immoral AND corrupt things. We’re waiting for an update from the authorities “doctors” as to what bits are true, what kinds of evidence there is, and who’s going down.

Suffice it to say the 37 indictments feel like there some THERE THERE.

We have THIS WEEK the hugely significant sentencing/reprimands/trials/status reports of Manafort,Stone, Gates/Flynn
Day 781

That said, while we wait, here’s a diversion…On the Mueller She Wrote (https://www.muellershewrote.com/) do a bit of speculating what may be up in terms of indictments on their podcast…and it is called the Fantasy Indictment League.

I am posting what their three leads are proposing may be in store next. It is not a real bet…just an educated guess, and @Keaton_James and others may be interested to see what/who they believe is going down next. (no money on this, just conjecture)

Here’s the rules and their best bets

This is the official #MSWFIL post where you post your FIVE picks for the this week. Each week I will make a post for you to reply to with your five picks, and if during that week, anyone of your picks gets indicted (whether they’re cooperating or not), you get points.

POINT STRUCTURE

20 points for a member of Trumps family or a Trump family business
10 points for congress members, SCOTUS NOMINEES, and current or former cabinet members
5 points for high level White House staff and inner circle staff, and businesses and entities
2 points for outer ring Americans
1 point for randos (random people we’ve likely never heard of) and Russians.
New plea deals also count, as do criminal charges, indictments, and any of those that were referred to outside orgs by Mueller.
1 additional point for a plea agreement modifier

This is not gambling. No gambling.

A G - I’ll go first: my five for this week are Assange, Wikileaks, Kushner, AMI, and Dylan Howard.

Jordan’s are Prince, DTJ, Sater, superseding Stone, and Bannon plea deal.

Jaleesa’s are Weisselberg, Corsi plea deal, Kaiser, Trump Inaugural, and Trump Org.

So if you have any thoughts who may be going down SOON, let’s hear it.

I have not a clue, but I have a WISH list, which includes all of the above. :grin:

Ok until then we wait (some more.)

4 Likes

Michael Flynn’s cooperation in Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation is complete, lawyers for the special counsel said in a Tuesday night report to a federal judge presiding over the former Trump national security adviser’s case.

In the same joint status report, Flynn’s lawyers asked for a 90-day delay in their client’s sentencing so he could continue to cooperate with the government in his former business partner’s upcoming trial in Alexandria, Va. Flynn expects to testify in the mid-July trial against Bijan Rafiekian, who faces charges of conspiracy and acting as an unregistered foreign government agent for Turkey.

4 Likes

More soon…

Paul Manafort’s prison sentence was upped to seven-and-a-half years on Wednesday morning, bringing an end to Robert Mueller’s most public legal battle and capping a spectacular fall for the globetrotting GOP consultant and former chairman of the Trump campaign.

The full sentence in Eastern District of Virginia is 60 months for the first count – 30 will be served concurrently – and 13 months of consecutive prison time on his second count, in addition to the 47-months Manafort was sentenced to in the D.C. District Court – our about 7.5 years. The break down is as follows:

  • 47 months (D.C. court sentence)
  • 30 months (EDVA first count balance)
  • 13 months (EDVA second count)
3 Likes

Manafort sentencing NOW in the DC court. He is pleading. “sorry.” :exploding_head:


Here’s the money shot (best quote)

3 Likes

Background:

3 Likes

Judge Berman Jackson sentences Manafort to 3 years concurrently with his other sentence, and an additional 43 months on top of that. Approximately 7.5 total years including the 4 years that he was sentenced to in VA.

ABJ - did take every bit of Manafort’s claims - he had gout, he was in solitary, he did not commit collusion…and straightened out the truth.

Gout - He never showed the ABJ any medical records on the gout.

Solitary -His solitary confinement included phones, internet and was an easy spot for Manafort to hang out, rather than be deprived.

No Collusion - She wanted to make sure Manafort’s lawyers could not spin this verdict to say there was ‘no collusion’ by saying the collusion question was not on trial here, and therefore does not mean it does not exist.

Manafort ordered to serve an additional 43 months in prison

Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered Paul Manafort to serve an additional 43 months in prison, on top of his sentence he received last week from the court in Virginia.

2 Likes

Oh shit!

3 Likes

Here’s (slightly) more:

4 Likes

The NYT

2 Likes

Paul J. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, has been charged in New York with mortgage fraud and more than a dozen other state felonies, the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., said Wednesday, an effort to ensure he will still face prison time if Mr. Trump pardons him for his federal crimes.

News of the indictment came shortly after Mr. Manafort was sentenced to his second federal prison term in two weeks; he now faces a combined sentence of more than seven years for tax and bank fraud and conspiracy in two related cases brought by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III.

The president has broad power to issue pardons for federal crimes, but has no such authority in state cases.

3 Likes

Manafort would go to Rikers island pre-trial? Lol

Fresh Manafort Indictment docs here :point_down:

16 counts!

3 Likes

Added some of these updates to Day 783.

1 Like

Things are winding down…Andrew Weissmann - lead prosecutor for Mueller is leaving.

He was the one that T hoped he would not be prosecuting him directly, since he’s a very sharp, aggressive prosecutor.

More to come…

1 Like

The House vote this am showed a commitment to getting the Mueller Report to the public, however it is non-binding. More momentum though towards this makes it clear, they want the Mueller Report revealed.

WASHINGTON — House Republicans joined Democrats on Thursday to overwhelmingly demand the Department of Justice release to Congress and the public the full findings of the special counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and the possible involvement of President Trump’s campaign.

Though the resolution is nonbinding and cannot force the Justice Department to take a particular action, Democrats who put it on the House floor are trying to build public pressure on Attorney General William P. Barr in advance of the investigation’s anticipated conclusion to share what Robert S. Mueller III produces. Far from standing in the way, Republicans joined Democrats en masse. On the 420-0 vote, four Republicans voted present.

3 Likes

Roger Stone will go on trial starting Nov. 5 in Washington, the federal judge presiding over the high-profile case said Thursday.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson set out a calendar for a two-week trial that will pit the longtime Trump associate against special counsel Robert Mueller on charges Stone lied to Congress and obstructed lawmakers’ Russia investigations.

3 Likes

There WILL be a Mueller Report book - in fact two. Here are some links and information…links to my bookstore Diesel, in Los Angeles. But look who’s on top of it…like the Starr Report, etc.

Two editions will be available soon!

The Mueller Report w/intro by Alan Dershowitz
or
The Mueller Report by The Washington Post

Pre-order by March 25th!

*These editions will be available as soon as possible after they are released to the general public by the Department of Justice. Pre-order your copy today!

Not sure which edition to get? Here’s the low-down on each:

The Mueller Report: The Final Report of the Special Counsel Into Donald Trump, Russia, and Collusion
Introduction by Alan Dershowitz $12.99

Special Counsel Robert Mueller III’s investigation into Russian influence on the 2016 election of Donald Trump–including links between the campaign and Russian interests, obstruction of justice by President Trump, and any other matters that may arise in the course of the investigation–has been the focal point of American politics since its inception in May 2017.

President Trump and his supporters affirm that the investigation is a “witch hunt” and the product of a plot by the political establishment–the “deep state”–to delegitimize his presidency. Democrats in the US House of Representatives hope to use the report to begin impeachment proceedings, with the support of those critical of the president. Media tracks Mueller’s every move, and the investigation has been subject to constant speculation by political pundits everywhere. It has resulted in the indictments of Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and many others.

Now, the wait is over. Mueller, a lifelong Republican, has concluded his investigation and submitted its findings to Attorney General William Barr. The Mueller investigation will join Watergate, and the Mueller Report will join the 9/11 Commission Report, the Warren Report, and the Starr Report, as one of the most important in history.

The Mueller Report is required reading for everyone with interest in American politics, for every 2016 and 2020 voter, and every American. It’s now available here as an affordable paperback, featuring an introduction from the eminent civil libertarian, Harvard Law Professor Emeritus, and New York Times bestselling author Alan Dershowitz, who provides a constitutional, civil law-based commentary sorely needed in today’s media landscape.

The Mueller Report
by The Washington Post $15.00

Read the findings of the Special Counsel’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, complete with accompanying analysis by the Post reporters who’ve covered the story from the beginning.

This edition from The Washington Post /Scribner contains:
–The long-awaited report
– An introduction by The Washington Post titled “A President, a Prosecutor, and the Protection of American Democracy”
– A timeline of the major events of the Special Counsel’s investigation from May 2017, when Robert Mueller was appointed, to the present day
– A guide to individuals involved, including in the Special Counsel’s Office, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Trump Campaign, the White House, the Trump legal defense team, and the Russians
– Key documents in the Special Counsel’s investigation, including filings pertaining to General Michael T. Flynn, Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Roger Stone, and the Russian internet operation in St. Petersburg. Each document is introduced and explained by Washington Post reporters.

One of the most urgent and important investigations ever conducted, the Mueller inquiry focuses on Donald Trump, his presidential campaign, and Russian interference in the 2016 election, and draws on the testimony of dozens of witnesses and the work of some of the country’s most seasoned prosecutors.

The special counsel’s investigation looms as a turning point in American history. The Mueller Report is essential reading for all citizens concerned about the fate of the presidency and the future of our democracy.

3 Likes

On Thursday, new evidence emerged that indicated that internet service providers owned by Mr. Gubarev appear to have been used to do just that: A report by a former F.B.I. cyberexpertunsealed in a federal court in Miami found evidence that suggests Russian agents used networks operated by Mr. Gubarev to start their hacking operation during the 2016 presidential campaign.

[Read the report here .]

His networks also appear to have been regularly used by cybercriminals and Russian agents to conduct other attacks, such as an assault on Ukraine’s power grid in 2015, the report found.

Yet the report stops short of directly linking Mr. Gubarev or his executives to the hacking, as asserted in the dossier. As Anthony Ferrante, the report’s lead author and a former F.B.I. agent, noted in a deposition: “I have no evidence of them actually sitting behind a keyboard.”

Mr. Gubarev has insisted that neither he nor his businesses knowingly took part in the Russian hacking. He backed up his denials by filing a defamation lawsuit against BuzzFeed, the first news organization to publish the dossier, which became public in January 2017. The report unsealed Thursday was commissioned by BuzzFeed to fend off Mr. Gubarev’s suit, which was dismissed in December when the court found BuzzFeed’s decision to publish protected under the law.

Evan Fray-Witzer, a lawyer for Mr. Gubarev, said that hackers using a client’s servers was hardly unique for a web-hosting company, or any tech company. Mr. Gubarev should not be held responsible for the misuse of his network by others that he neither approved nor knew about, Mr. Fray-Witzer said.

“You could say the same thing about Google’s infrastructure and Amazon’s infrastructure — and no one is accusing them of hacking anyone just because hackers used their infrastructure,” he said.

3 Likes

Isn’t he mixed up in that Epstein case with Alex Acosta?

Yes, am watching Maddow explain this…and thanks for linking this breaking news. This Gubarev who tried to sue buzzfeed AND was listed in the Steele dossier was what the Steele dossier thought - a participant in some kind of hacking.

We are so freakin’ close to unveiling the hacking to our systems was a targetted and systematic scheme to upend the votes for The Donald.

I know we are close…how could we not be.?

:exploding_head:

2 Likes