I had referenced CNN and The Washington Post above and now NYTimes and The Hill have published articles as well:
I meant for the Roger Stone comment.
Oops
The source for Stone was Stoneâs comments in this CNN segment yesterday: Roger Stone distances himself from Nunberg - CNN Video
whoa. completely missed this! weird!
Thanks Amy!
And here I thought the President George Bush Turnpike in Texas was bad.
Utah would be wise to wait & see how all this turns out before they waste their money on the signs. Unless it terminates in a sewage treatment facility? That would be appropriate.
Nah, we should kick these guys out on their asses. Bunch of freeloaders living off the government. They need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
Felt like I was watching Homeland when this was going down.
Or sobered up.
Haha. Once he woke up with his hangover, and listened to his messages
More than likely, his father figure either read him the riot act or made it clear he didnât appreciate Nunbergâs efforts. In one interview I saw, Stone tried to distance himself from Nunberg and said that had Nunberg consulted him, he would have told him he was being foolish for thinking he could get away with ignoring the subpoena. But he also implied that this might be a case of unrequited love and that Nunbergâs affection for him might not be reciprocated. He seemed genuinely confused by Nunbergâs deep affection towards him. Or he did a great job hiding it which, according to several commentators, would not have been surprising. Apparently, both Stone and Nunberg have a history of manipulating the public to think a certain way.