1/ Michael Cohen has "knowledge" implicating Trump in a "criminal conspiracy" to hack the Democratic emails during the 2016 election, according to Cohen's attorney. Lanny Davis also said Cohen's knowledge reached beyond "the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude" and is willing to share "all that he knows" with Robert Mueller's team. (Washington Post / NBC News / Los Angeles Times / Politico)
In terms of Cohen turning to Muellerâs team and pleading guilty to tax crimes and campaign finance violations, we will never know the real reasoning behind this. It could really be that the jail time alone would have been unbearable, but also he could not afford lawyers or legal defense. One wonders how much his âtake a bulletâ for the president was just an urge to be loved, as T had always wanted as well. But this is just conjecture.
Hereâs a WSJ article about some of the thinking that Cohen may have been doing behind turning himself in, and hoping for a good plea deal agreement. It postures that eventually his father and family convinced him to do this. I tend to agree with this but of course, thereâs always some spin behind all reporting.
Oh and of course, this being the WSJ, they do think that the President can not be indicted (unsettled law) so they too are leaning w/ the Râs, naturally.
Mr. Cohen told associates and friends he felt Mr. Trump didnât have his back and vented that the president hadnât personally offered to pay his legal bills in the Manhattan investigation, which he said were âbankruptingâ him.
Mr. Cohenâs troubles increased in May, when Evgeny âGeneâ Freidman, a New
York City taxi mogul who managed taxi medallions owned by Mr. Cohen and his relatives, pleaded guilty to state criminal tax fraud and agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors in their probe of Mr. Cohen.
By then, prosecutors and the Internal Revenue Service had focused on Mr. Cohenâs personal income taxes. In conversations with a potential witness in June and July, investigators asked âvery pointedâ questions about various tax filings, according to a person familiar with the conversations.
âThey knew what they wanted, they knew what they had, and they went after it,â the person said.
In late June, Mr. Cohen openly broke with Mr. Trump.
A personal turning point for Mr. Cohen was a conversation with his father, Maurice Cohen, a Holocaust survivor.
Mr. Cohenâs father urged him not to protect the president, saying he didnât survive the Holocaust to have his name sullied by Mr. Trump, according to a person who was told about the conversation. The elder Mr. Cohen couldnât be reached for comment.
On June 20, Mr. Cohen stepped down from his position as the Republican National Committeeâs deputy finance chairman and tweeted his first public criticism of his former boss: âAs the son of a Polish holocaust survivor, the images and sounds of this family separation policy [are] heart wrenching.â The tweet no longer appears on Mr. Cohenâs Twitter account.
By then, Mr. Cohen had hired New York lawyer Guy Petrillo to represent him in the Manhattan U.S. attorneyâs probe. The choice of Mr. Petrillo, who had once served as the chief of the officeâs criminal division, was seen as a sign that Mr. Cohen hoped to cooperate. Mr. Petrillo began to signal this intent to prosecutors.
Shortly after Mr. Petrilloâs hiring, Mr. Cohen told ABC News in an interview that his first loyalty was to his family and country, not to the president.
In July, a recording became public that Mr. Cohen surreptitiously made of a conversation he had with Mr. Trump in September 2016 about buying the rights to Ms. McDougalâs story. The president has denied the affair.
The presidentâs legal team had waived attorney-client privilege on the recording, which had been seized in the April 9 raid.
The week of the recordingâs release, the investigation appeared to accelerate, people familiar with the investigation said.
Federal prosecutors faced an early September deadline to charge Mr. Cohen. After that, they would have to wait until after the midterm elections, under Department of Justice guidelines, or risk criticism of potentially affecting the electionâs outcome. They had follow-up witness interviews scheduled as recently as this week, a person familiar with the investigation said, but canceled them as the plea agreement came together over the weekend.
Given the Justice Departmentâs policy of not indicting sitting presidents, a guilty plea from Mr. Cohen and his public implication of Mr. Trump were among the strongest outcomes prosecutors could have hoped for, according to former federal prosecutors. For prosecutors, the guilty plea meant they could avoid a contentious trial and free up resources to pursue other investigations.
On Monday, Manhattan federal prosecutors filed a court document, in a case then labeled as U.S. v. John Doe, indicating a guilty plea was forthcoming.
By Tuesday night, hours after Mr. Cohen implicated Mr. Trump in a possible crime, one of Mr. Cohenâs lawyers, Lanny Davis, appeared on cable news shows to say Mr. Cohen wouldnât accept a pardon from Mr. Trump and âis more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows.â
Two new polls out today have interesting implications for Democrats heading into the midterms.
The first shows Texasâ Democratic candidate for Senate Beto OâRourke trailing incumbent Senator/everyoneâs least favorite human Ted Cruz by just four points, 45-49, meaning that it truly is possible Texas goes blue in November.
At the same time, new polling from New Jersey shows the Senate race between incumbent Democrat Bob Menendez and his Republican challengerâs narrowing, 43-37. Menendez was previously indicted on 18 counts of corruption and Democrats are hammering an anti-corruption message nationwide.
So, out of the blue at 1:10 AM EDT, Trump threw this all-caps tantrum. No tweets leading up to it (his previous tweet was hours before), no tweets after it. Sometimes, I really do believe our President is losing it. Or maybe heâs on drugs â seriously.
Itâs perfectly OK for Trump to express his displeasure at the Special Counselâs investigation, but itâs so bizarre for him to do it in this manner. Anybody else feel this way or am I overreacting?
Disclaimer: Yes, Iâm also posting late at night, but I hope you can tell Iâm reasonably lucid â just a mellow night owl.
âWe have taken heightened steps to fortify our cybersecurity â especially as the Trump Administration refuses to crack down on foreign interference in our elections. In an abundance of caution, our digital partners ran tests that followed extensive training. Despite our misstep and the alarms that were set off, itâs most important that all of the security systems in place worked,â Brandon Dillon, the chair of the Michigan Democratic Party, said in a statement. . . .
âThere are constant attempts to hack the DNC and our Democratic infrastructure, and while we are extremely relieved that this wasnât an attempted intrusion by a foreign adversary, this incident is further proof that we need to continue to be vigilant in light of potential attacks,â Bob Lord, the DNCâs chief security officer, added.
The DNCâs snafu comes amid reporting of other attempted hacks on Democratic campaigns. Last week, it emerged two Democratic primary campaigns in California had been breached earlier this year.
I commend the DNC and CNN for having the integrity to own up and set the record straight. I posted the original story yesterday. I stand by the spirit of my comments in that post calling for a concerted, coordinated effort to protect our election systems against cyberattacks.
Another huge development. Itâs remarkable to consider that one of Trumpâs closest friends, who has done him many favors over the years, may actually be flipping.
Even if we saw all branches of concerned government entities - DNI, CIA, FBI,Homeland Security show their solidarity photo it does bear emphasizing over and over again that we are no where near having any secured systems.
And we also have no position for Cybesecurity in office, right?!
See 5.30.18 Wired article
Not only are so many agencies vulnerable, but over half lack even the ability to determine what software runs on their systems. And only one in four agencies could confirm that they have the capability to detect and investigate signs of a data breach, meaning that the vast majority are essentially flying blind. "Federal agencies do not have the visibility into their networks to effectively detect data exfiltration attempts and respond to cybersecurity incidents," the report states bluntly.
âThe threat is real. It is continuing,â Coats said, later adding, âWe are doing everything we can to have a legitimate election.â
A Must Watch!!! Salute @BetoORourke for the candid thoughtful words!
@nowthisnews
âI can think of nothing more American.â â Beto OâRourke â the man taking on Ted Cruz â brilliantly explains why NFL players kneeling during the anthem is not disrespectful
What about when the US is coughing up blood? Because thatâs kind of what it feels like, being at Ground Zero. Thank you for a non-US, non-partisan viewpoint, itâs a breath of fresh air.
The points you highlight are spot on. Trump is completely out of his depth, he should have never left the shallow end of the pool. As weâve all read from the âtell allâ books, of which there have been plenty, Trump never envisioned being president. I totally believe he thought that he was going to lose, perhaps by the slimmest of margins, but then his charisma, complete with âlock her upâ war chants, would propel him towards a new business venture in broadcasting i.e. The Trump Network. This newfound fame and the scorned candidate gig would be sure to replenish the millions he had lost in other sordid plots.
The problem here in the U.S., which should be as plain as the noses on our faces, is that we donât have a recall system, or any way to call for a new election. Weâre on this vicious 2 year cycle, replete with con trails from AF1 jumbo jets, to waste all sorts of time and money on a âpartialâ shakeup of the parliamentary wing every 2 years, and an executive branch re-do every 4. Instead of quivering in our boots about the repercussions of âan impeachmentâ and worrying about âeveryone becoming poor because the markets will crashâ (another bald faced lie, stock ownership is not universal in the U.S.), why canât someone just say âwell, gee, it looks like we might have an issue with Mr. Trumpâs leadership, letâs have a special electionâ.
But nope, no one wants to change the rules so weâre stuck with a peak-narcissist asshole for 4 full years. Internationally, there has to be some worry that this unbalanced leader of the Free World, could feel entitled to start a nuclear war because of his deep seated need to draw attention to himself, but weâre all hopeful that the military commanders know the Commander in Chief is crazy as a shit house rat.
And, finally, to your question of How Did This Happen? Itâs because of the antiquated Electoral College, Republican gerrymandering, and foreign interference. On the latter, most of us common folk donât have a way to gauge it, but it could span the gamut from preying on the Deplorables via silly FaceBook ads or phony hate groups, all the way to actual ballot box hacking. No one here wants to talk about that much, but the elections really couldâve been rigged, or it could simply be that 78,000 votes have a louder voice than 3 million popular votes. Itâs all pretty FUâd up.
No I donât think you are overreacting. Admittedly Iâm viewing the daily shock and horror from a great distance, and so, am not as intimately involved as you. But there is a saying here in New Zealand - âwhen the US sneezes, NZ catches the fluâ.
So we tend to keep a wary eye on political happenings around the world, probably far more than those in larger countries might do so. Iâve thought for some time now, that you currently have a person in the most senior position of your government that is completely out of his depth, and totally unsuitable personally for the task. The most recent events are showing him to be flailing blindly. He is trying desperately to divert attention away from his effort to keep his extra-marital affairs secret at a critical time just prior to the election.
Just how he came to be elected still is a mystery to me. We have had some pretty dreadful Prime Ministers in the past but their faults are quickly seen, and they never last long. If someone is clearly failing in the task, the governing party has the capacity to change them, without going back to the polls, and the country moves on⌠vis David Cameron in the UK resigned and was replaced by Theresa May. In Australia right now, their Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull ,is under pressure to go, and there are two other candidates who are awaiting in the wings to replace him - depending on the support they would receive from within the Liberal party.
He will continue to spin his âWITCH HUNTâ sloganâŚbut he did go on Fox News to rework the narrative, suggesting that flipping should be a crime ( ex. You can say anything you want), if he were impeached the markets would crash.
It almost ought to be outlawed. Itâs not fair," Trump said of Cohen, who he described as only a âpart-timeâ lawyer. âIf you can say something bad about Donald Trump and you will go down to two years or three years, which is the deal he made, in all fairness to him, most people are going to do that. ⌠And I have seen it many times. I have had many friends involved in this stuff. Itâs called flipping and it almost ought to be illegal.â
While the President was aware for weeks of the possible damage Cohen could do in his dealings with federal prosecutors, Trump did not know until Tuesday afternoon that he would be so explicitly implicated in the campaign finance charges.
Salute 
