Peggy Noonan was a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan. While she is still very much a conservative, and is writing for the WSJ, also a conservative paper she is known to be fair-minded as well. She describes Cohenâs testimony in the context of history, and notes that Cohen was credible and impactful. No doubt about that.
Michael Cohen Makes History
Thereâs no precedent for such an attack on the essential nature of an American president.
By
Peggy Noonan
Michael Cohen is, famously, a lowlife and screwball whoâs made his living as an enforcer, liar and thug. He is going to prison essentially for these things. He has taken to implying his turning on Donald Trump is linked to an inner moral conversion, which may be true but is conveniently timed: He has nothing to lose and some form of leniency to gain.
But I found his testimony before the House Oversight and Reform Committee credible overall, and I suspect most everyone in America did, because no one, friend of the president or foe, love him or hate him, thinks Mr. Trump has a high personal character or an especially admirable back story. And that was Mr. Cohenâs subject.
Democrats say the purpose of the hearing was to get at the truth, Republicans say it was to disrupt the Trump presidency, and both are correct. But history, which is a real and actual thing, was also at the table, and this is what history was told by a man who was for 10 years the presidentâs personal lawyer and confidante, an intimate who was present at the creation:
Mr. Cohen implied the presidentâs Russian policies are not and never have been on the up-and-up: âMr. Trump knew of and directed the Trump-Moscow negotiations throughout the campaign, and lied about it. He lied because he never expected to win the election. He also lied about it because he stood to make hundreds of millions of dollars on the Moscow real-estate project.â Mr. Cohen said he came to see the presidentâs true character: âSince taking office he has become the worst version of himself. . . . Donald Trump is a man who ran for office to make his brand great, not to make our country great. He had no desire or intention to lead this nationâonly to market himself and to build his wealth and power. Mr. Trump would often say, the campaign is going to be the âgreatest infomercial in political history.â He never expected to win the primary. He never expected to win the general election. The campaignâfor himâwas always a marketing opportunity.â
None of these charges were new, precisely. They have been made in books, investigations and interviews both on and off the record. What is amazing though is that such a rebukeâsuch an attack on the essential nature of a president, and by an intimateâhas no equal in our history. I donât think, as we talk about Mr. Cohenâs testimony, we fully appreciate this. John Dean said there was a cancer growing in the presidency. He didnât say Richard Nixon was the cancer. He didnât say the president was wicked and a fraud.
This is bigger than we think, and history wonât miss the import of this testimony.
Were the hearings step one in an ultimate impeachment attempt? Weâll see. The 7½ hours came across like the artillery bombardment before the charge. Older Democrats will counsel that the way forward is to spend the next year weakening the presidentâ2020 is coming, a move to impeach will cause grave national trouble. Will they prevail?
Everyone focuses on the always-upcoming Mueller report, but the action seems to be in Manhattan. When Mr. Cohen was asked if there were any illegal acts regarding Donald Trump that hadnât come up in the hearings, he said yes. âThose are a part of the investigation thatâs currently being looked at by the Southern District of New York,â meaning the U.S. attorney there. What did the president or one of his agents communicate to Mr. Cohen the last time they had contact? âThis topic is actually something thatâs being investigated right now by the Southern District of New York.â
The Southern District of New York sure sounds busy. Theyâve granted immunity to the chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, and theyâre not limited by a specific mandate. They can look into any crime that took place within their jurisdiction. They took down the Mafia using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Performance by the new committee members was uneven. When the professionally fiery Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) made a speech implying that Republican member Mark Meadows was racist, Chairman Elijah Cummings defused the situation and Ms. Tlaib retreated, suggesting she was sorry she was misunderstood, by which she seemed to mean she was sorry sheâd been comprehended. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, under criticism back home for her role in dooming the Amazon jobs deal, shrewdly played against type, eschewing a showy speech and instead asking carefully targeted questions.
Mr. Cohen didnât always seem to be telling the whole truth. At least in one instance he appears to have misremembered or been untruthful. That is when he claimed he hadnât wanted a job in the White House. Reporters who were there remember it differently. Dana Bash: âAll of us, by people in and around the process, real time [were told] he very much wanted a job in the White House.â
Mr. Cohen insisted he had been offered a job, in White House counsel Don McGahnâs office, and rejected it. But that was the tell: Such jobs traditionally go to bright young people with impeccable credentials and good social skills. The presidentâs 50-year-old personal lawyer and fixer would have wanted a bigger role and title. If he felt dissed by such an offer itâs because he was.
I want to return to the subject of the presidentâs character. I texted this week with a great Trump supporter in Georgia, with whom Iâd talked often during the 2016 campaign. âWe do not care what Trump did before he became our president,â she said. âHe has kept his promises to us.â
She was saying essentially that he has a high political character.
She does not trust those whoâve been around the president, calling them âliars, leakers and backstabbers.â I asked why he would have appointed bad men and women as aides. âHe hired bad people in error,â she said. âThey were bad actors, disloyal people. He was betrayed by them.â
She feels Mr. Trump has come through, from the courts to the economy. And when he got to Washington he didnât go nativeâhe still hates all the right people. She has also become protective of him. She sees him clobbered every day in every way throughout media. It has made him not only a sympathetic figure but an endearing one.
We close with Mr. Cummings, in his 23rd year in the House. He put a fair-minded face on the hearing. His closing remarks were powerful and humane, and seemed targeted not only at Mr. Cohen but perhaps at the newer members of Congress.
We are here to improve our democracy, he said.
To Mr. Cohen: âIf I hear you correctly, it sounds like youâre crying out for a new normalâfor us getting back to normal. Sounds to me like you want to make sure our democracy stays intact.â
Then, more broadly: âThe one meeting I had with the president, I said, âThe greatest gift we can give to our children is making sure we give them a democracy that is better than the one we came upon.â â He hoped all of us can get âthe democracy we want,â and pass it on to our children, âso they can do better than we did.â
Amen.
