WTF Community

👑 Portrait of a President

Leaked Trump Admin Document Describes Billie Eilish as ‘Destroying Our Country and Everything We Care About’

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/leaked-trump-admin-document-describes-191559664.html

A leading Trump administration official reportedly tainted a $250 million advertising contract originally intended to “defeat despair and inspire hope” amid the pandemic by, among other sadly unsurprising things, excluding public figures they believed were not aligned with Trump or his widely panned policy attempts.

A peculiar amount of ire, per the Washington Post , was reserved for Grammy winner Billie Eilish. A document detailing the administration’s problems with an assortment of “at least” 274 artists and celebrities who were being considered for the public health campaign pointed out that Eilish is, in fact, “not a Trump supporter.” Furthermore, in the words of the document, the Trump team is convinced the 18-year-old megastar is “destroying our country and everything we care about.”

Top-ranking Democrats recently penned a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar stating that documents from the campaign showed HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Michael Caputo trying to use the taxpayer-funded effort as a way of helping the president and failed steak salesman’s image.

Other figures who were under consideration but ultimately not approved for similar reasons include Jennifer Lopez, Judd Apatow, George Lopez, Christina Aguilera, Adam Levine, Justin Timberlake, Jack Black, and Johnny Depp.

It’s worth noting that it appears the pricey public health ad, though said to have intentionally been intended to encourage optimism during the ongoing pandemic, quickly became more of an attempt to track down virtually apolitical celebrities and/or those who would somehow manage to make Trump look good.

Ultimately, only 10 celerities—including Dr. Oz and Dennis Quaid—got the approval from the administration to be involved with the program. However, the program itself is currently under review, with none of the PSA videos having aired publicly.

Anyway, next February will bring fans the Apple TV+ premiere of Eilish’s new documentary The World’s a Little Blurry . Fans who attended Eilish’s recent Where Do We Go? livestream event were treated with a new clip from the 2021 release.

2 Likes

One more whiny moment with T, and he got what he wanted - favorable tax rates for real estate investors.

NYTimes: How a Century of Real-Estate Tax Breaks Enriched Donald Trump

Twenty-five years before he was elected president, Donald J. Trump went to Capitol Hill to complain that Congress had closed too many tax loopholes. He warned that one industry, in particular, had been severely harmed: real estate.

The recent demise of real estate tax shelters, part of a landmark 1986 overhaul of the tax code, was “an absolute catastrophe for the country,” Mr. Trump testified to Congress that day in November 1991.

“Real estate really means so many jobs,” he said. “You create so many other things. They buy carpet. They buy furniture. They buy refrigerators. They buy other things that fuel the economy.”

Mr. Trump was sounding a theme that has made real estate perhaps the tax code’s most-favored industry.

2 Likes

You might be the greatest meglomaniac…maybe that is the best descriptor for you. :hear_no_evil:

2 Likes


Trump complains his Supreme Court loss will ‘induce violence in the streets’ in latest election threat

In an apparent new threat by President Donald J. Trump Monday night, the 74-year-old said that the Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania would “induce violence in the streets.”

Trump’s full tweet read, “The Supreme Court decision on voting in Pennsylvania is a VERY dangerous one. It will allow rampant and unchecked cheating and will undermine our entire systems of laws. It will also induce violence in the streets. Something must be done!”

The incumbent president may need Pennsylvania in order to stop his Democratic opponent Joe Biden from getting to the 270 electoral votes needed to win the reigns of the country on Election Day.

“If former Vice President Joe Biden wins every state that 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton won four years ago and flips Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — all of which Trump won four years ago — that would get him over the 270 electoral votes he needs in order to win the election,” Raw Story reported Oct. 29.

“Trump’s best path to stop Biden is for there to be a larger than average polling error in Arizona and especially Pennsylvania,” CNN reported Monday. “If Trump is able to take both Florida and North Carolina (along with Georgia, which has similar polling to Florida), then you can begin to see how Trump could pull it off. He would need to win in Arizona and Pennsylvania. Is that possible? Yes. Will it be easy? No.”

image

1 Like

Somebody take Junior’s coloring book away please. I think he’s been sniffing the sharpies.


1 Like


Deutsche Bank has about $340 million in loans outstanding to the Trump Organization, the president’s umbrella group that is currently overseen by his two sons, according to filings made by Trump to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics in July and a senior source within the bank. The three loans, which are against Trump properties and start coming due in two years, are current on payments and personally guaranteed by the president, according to two bank officials.

In meetings in recent months, a Deutsche Bank management committee that oversees reputational and other risks for the lender in the Americas region has discussed ways in which it could rid the bank of these last vestiges of the relationship, two of the three bank officials said. The bank has over the years lent Trump more than $2 billion, one of the officials said.

One idea that has come up in the meetings: sell the loans in the secondary market, two of the bank officials said. But one of the officials said that idea has not gained traction, in part because it is not clear who would want to buy the loans and the attendant problems that come with it.

While it was known that Deutsche Bank has been closely examining its relationship with Trump, including by setting up a working group in 2016 to review the bank’s relationship with him, its recent eagerness to end all ties and the contours of discussions in light of the election have not been previously reported.

Deutsche Bank declined to comment. The Trump Organization did not respond to requests for comment. The White House declined to comment.

WARREN’S WARNING

The German bank, which first started lending to Trump in the late 1990s, has been dragged into congressional and other investigations into the real estate mogul-turned-politician’s finances and alleged Russia connections.

The probes and the bad press, seen by one senior executive as “serious collateral damage” from the relationship, are an unwelcome distraction for the bank, the three officials said. It comes at a time when Chief Executive Christian Sewing is trying to turn Deutsche Bank around after its decades-long run at becoming a major Wall Street bank left it nursing huge losses.

Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat member of the Senate banking committee, has previously called for an investigation into Deutsche Bank over its money laundering controls and has demanded answers from the lender about its relationship with Trump and his family. She told Reuters that she intended to keep pushing for a probe in the next administration.

“You bet I’m going to continue to fight for accountability and strong enforcement of our banking laws, especially for giant institutions like Deutsche Bank,” she said.

What happens next for the bank rests on the outcome of Tuesday’s elections, according to the three bank officials.

If the Republican president loses, and Democrats take control of the White House and Congress, senior Deutsche Bank executives believe congressional investigations that have stalled amid a court battle over access to Trump’s financial records could be rejuvenated, the three bank officials said.

In this scenario, however, Deutsche Bank executives believe they will also have more freedom to deal with the loans and end their relationship with Trump, the officials said. They hope doing so might help reduce some of the scrutiny, they said.

DIFFERENT SCENARIOS

The loans, which are against Trump’s golf course in Miami, and hotels in Washington and Chicago, are such that the Trump Organization has only had to pay interest on them so far, and the entire principal is outstanding, two of the three bank officials said. They come due in 2023 and 2024, the filings show.

The businesses backing the loans face challenges. The coronavirus-driven economic slowdown has hit the travel industry, including hotels. Moreover, last month Reuters reported that Trump’s plan to make money by developing houses and hotels on his golf courses, including the one involving the Deutsche Bank loan, had not panned out so far.

The Deutsche Bank executives are not unduly concerned about Trump’s ability to repay the loans, given the president’s personal guarantees and the time left before they come due, the three bank officials said.

If Trump is not in office, Deutsche Bank executives feel that it would be easier for them to demand repayment, foreclose if he is not able to pay it off or refinance, or try to sell the loans, according to two of the three bank officials.

Since Trump has personally guaranteed all the loans, Deutsche Bank could also seize the president’s assets if he is unable to repay, two of the three bank officials said.

If Trump wins a second term, Deutsche Bank executives feel their options would be fewer, the three bank officials said. The bank wouldn’t want the negative publicity inherent with seizing assets from a sitting president and would likely extend the loans until he is out of office, two of the bank officials said.

The bottom line, the three bank officials said, is that the matter won’t be resolved until well after the election.

4 Likes

Do they think that getting rid of these loans will keep them from harsher litigation results? Like, seriously, this institution is clearly protected by some very powerfully corrupt people so why the sudden attempt to cut ties?
(This is likely just a rhetorical question, I don’t actually give much more than a fraction of a shit lol.)

4 Likes

I think they realize that when he loses they’ll never get their money back and are dearly desperate to recoup their massive losses.

3 Likes

LOL - I so agree!

Yes, Deutsche Bank is just ridding itself of T’s legal threats maybe. He could make it ugly for them perhaps. But also Deutsche knows T’s financial situation and his constant ‘levering’ (his word) of assets against borrowed funds. I think they think of him as a snake who could make it far worse.

And this is BS…they know T’s not winning a second term. They just want out of further legal entanglement. I think.

Dark Towers book - by David Enrich goes into the shady history Deutsche has with money laundering, fines that it pays, and the T connection. And the personal loan officers - one was the son of the SCOTUS judge Kennedy who left the court, opening the seat up to Kavanaugh.

Just stinks to high heaven…but WTF. So does this whole Administration. :woman_facepalming:

3 Likes

Now that T is behind the WH in his own media bunker…this is what he is plotting.

More Reality FAKE NEWS TV - WTF

2 Likes

While you watch Donald Trump’s presidency stagger to what appears to be its ugly end, always keep in mind how it began: Trump entered the political world on the back of the “birther” conspiracy theory, a movement whose importance was massively underestimated at the time. Aside from its racist undertones, think about what a belief in birtherism really implied. If you doubted that Barack Obama was born in the United States—and about a third of Americans did, including 72 percent of registered Republicans—then that meant you also believed that Obama was an illegitimate president. That meant, in other words, you believed that everyone— the entire American political, judicial, and media establishment, including the White House and Congress, the federal courts and the FBI, all of them —was complicit in a gigantic plot to swindle the public into accepting this false commander in chief. A third of Americans had so little faith in American democracy, broadly defined, they were willing to think that Obama’s entire presidency was a fraud.

That third of Americans went on to become Trump’s base. Over four years, they continued to applaud him, no matter what he did, not because they necessarily believed everything he said, but often because they didn’t believe anything at all. If everything is a scam, who cares if the president is a serial liar? If all American politicians are corrupt, then so what if the president is too? If everyone has always broken the rules, then why can’t he do that too? No wonder they didn’t object when Trump’s White House defied congressional subpoenas with impunity, or when he used the Department of Justice to pursue personal vendettas, or when he ignored ethics guidelines and rules about security clearances, or when he fired watchdogs and inspectors general. No wonder they cheered him on when he denigrated the CIA and the State Department as the “deep state,” or laughed and smiled when he called journalists “enemies of the people.”

More by this writer

Not all of this was Trump’s doing. Many Americans had lost trust in democratic institutions long before he arrived on the scene. One recent survey showed that half of the country is dissatisfied with our political system; one-fifth told pollsters that they would be happy to live under military rule. Trump not only exploited this democratic deficit to win the White House, but he expanded it while in office. And now his political, financial, and maybe even emotional strategy requires him to damage America’s faith in its democracy further.

He is launching that strategy right now. And to be clear: It is a strategy, not a random reaction to events. Trump is no good at governing, but he has long understood, with the intuition of a seasoned con man, how to create distrust, and how to use that distrust to his advantage. The journalist Lesley Stahl has said he once told her that he attacks the media to “discredit you all and demean you all so that when you write negative stories about me no one will believe you.” He discredited and demeaned public servants such as the National Security Council staffers Fiona Hill and Alexander Vindman too, so that when they spoke honestly about his behavior, no one would believe them either.

Now, having spent months talking darkly about the rules being rigged against him, he has laid a set of traps designed to discredit and demean the electoral system so that some Americans, at least, lose their faith in it. This has been said by others, but it bears restating: That Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan did not finish counting their votes on Tuesday night is no accident. In all of these states, Republican legislators prevented their election boards from counting postal votes before Election Day. In the midst of a pandemic that Democrats take more seriously than Republicans do, after Trump himself told his followers that voting by mail was suspect, the partisan gap between in-person and postal voters was always likely to be stark.

Trump anticipated that vote totals might begin to shift in Joe Biden’s favor. That was why, when he spoke at 2:20 a.m. on Election Night, before results were even remotely clear, he declared the vote “a fraud on the American public” and announced that “we don’t want them to find any ballots at 4 o’clock in the morning and add them to the list.” That’s why Republicans had already launched a rash of frivolous lawsuits, designed to create the appearance that something was wrong. One case alleging fraud in Montana has been thrown out for lack of any evidence whatsoever. Trevor Potter, the president of the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center and the general counsel for John McCain’s 2000 and 2008 presidential campaigns, told me that one of the Pennsylvania suits is “laughable”; all of the others are just “probing at soft spots,” using different legal avenues to slow down the counts or get ballots thrown out in any manner possible.

2 Likes
3 Likes

Ivana Trump Reacts to Ex-Husband Donald Losing to Biden: ‘I Just Want This Whole Thing to Be Over’

“He hates to be a loser, that I’m sure of,” the president’s first ex-wife says, "but if he loses, he loses

For the record, President Donald Trump’s ex-wife Ivana Trump is sick of all of this too.

“I just want this whole thing to be over with, one way or the other,” Ivana, 71, tells PEOPLE. “I really don’t care.”

Trump, 74, has insisted that he won’t personally accept the results of the presidential election in which he was defeated by Joe Biden and he has said he will mount a series of legal challenges in the states where he lost, such as Nevada and Pennsylvania.

Without evidence, the president has argued the 2020 contest was “stolen” from him and that the votes for Biden were fraudulent, echoing claims he has made about other elections going back years.

“He’s not a good loser,” says Ivana, the president’s first wife and mother of his three oldest children. “He doesn’t like to lose, so he’s going to fight and fight and fight.

While some Republicans have echoed Trump’s allegations of wrongdoing, President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris’s election was recognized by former Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.

Sen. Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, likewise sent his congratulations.

Other leading conservatives have made more vague statements about the importance of investigating any serious allegation of fraud.

Around the globe, Biden was congratulated by leaders such as U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Still, Trump and his allies say the election isn’t over even as some around him acknowledge the challenge ahead.

“We just want the process to play out,” says one former administration official turned Trump adviser. “The media don’t get to call elections, the people do.”

“The states have to certify [their results by December],” this source says.

Nonetheless, they tell PEOPLE, "I’ll always think the president did not get the campaign he deserved. They raised $1 billion and lost to Joe Biden."

Another source close to the Trumps tells PEOPLE there’s “still chaos” within the immediate family and that they haven’t fully realized the election results because “nobody was expecting it.”

“It’s been a headache,” the source says.

Says a third source, who is close with son Eric Trump: “They’re very upset. It’s been hard to watch.”

Ivana tells PEOPLE her three children with her ex-husband — Eric, Donald Jr. and Ivanka — are doing “fine” but that she can’t wait for them to move on from Washington, D.C.

“I just want them to be able to live their normal lives — normal lives ,” the businesswoman and former model says. “Not the Washington life and all that, just in New York or wherever they’re going to be and just live their normal lives.”

“I think they enjoyed being around Donald and running the election and seeing what will happen, but now it is — thank god — over,” Ivana says. “I’m not really sure what they are going to be up to.”

(A source close to Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, both of whom are senior White House aides, had only rosy projections to make: “Back of the envelope, the opportunities that are available to them — without getting too much in the weeds — it’s obvious they can be in control of the Republican Party for decades or they can do international work or business.”)

As for the president, his ex — with whom he has had a notoriously tempestuous relationship through the decades and who isn’t shy about offering her opinion on him and the White House, praising his conservative achievements — guesses that he’s likely to be done with politics despite his bluster.

“I don’t think he has a choice,” Ivana says. “He’s going to go down to Palm Beach and play golf and live the normal life, I think. This is the best choice for what he can do.”

But first, he would have to face reality.

“He has to go and declare that he lost. But he hates to be a loser, that I’m sure of,” Ivana says. “But if he loses, he loses. He has plenty of money, places to go and live in and enjoy his life.”

2 Likes

Here’s what the Scots think about Donald J Trump - they are starting to investigate his Golf properties there and ordered an ‘Unexplained Wealth Order,’ UWO which can looking into the sources of his financing in Scotland.

3 Likes

The Scottish have never tolerated Donnie well. I got all of this from 2016, before the election:

2 Likes

Been posted before I think - but still gold.
BTW my folks are from the Western Isles - as was Trump’s g’mother. Stornaway is one of my favourite places to be on earth.

Just a wee look at Stornaway

and completely off-topic but one of my fav songs here is Peat and Diesel with their smash hit (at least in Scotland) Lovely Stornaway

3 Likes

That sounds terrifyingly right…

Yet this is reassuring.

2 Likes

2 Likes

I just went to lodge a complaint against the Trump campaign with the Federal Election Commission?

I can’t. Per their website, ALL complaints must be made in writing, & since June 18th the FEC is not able to receive complaints delivered by courier.

PS: I was lodging a complaint because when I tried to unsubscribe from the avalanche of Trump e-mails I keep getting begging for money after I filled out a single survey telling them how bad he is at everything, it instead sent me to another survey, then to WinRed, and did not unsubscribe.

3 Likes

Signs of a narcissist sociopath

Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder

  • Grandiose sense of self-importance. …
  • Lives in a fantasy world that supports their delusions of grandeur. …
  • Needs constant praise and admiration. …
  • Sense of entitlement. …
  • Exploits others without guilt or shame. …
  • Frequently demeans, intimidates, bullies, or belittles others.
2 Likes